Thursday, October 13, 2005

Media Language:

“Sin City” posses several voiceovers provided by the main characters. This typically film noire convention is utilized so as to better identify with their perspectives, as well as to given a particular insight into emotions and motives. This constant commentary can get somewhat annoying, especially when the three, major male characters–-ultimately suggesting of a patriarchal society– all adhere to a somewhat bloody mindset. Mind, there’s nothing particularly wrong with this, save the fact that there isn’t any particularly striking contrast that would ultimately bolster the impact of the running narratives.

Music wise, “Sin City” unfortunately doesn’t boast any contrapuntal tones, and often it’s non-diegetic sounds come forth during a lack of dialogue between the characters. Much like some other action films, James Bond for one, it has a reoccurring tune. This one is a low base one which initiates when an objective or task is set clearly before a character, or as they hit the conclusion to start said task.

It is of note that Sin City is not shot night-by-night like past film noir. For that fact, it is the cheaper opposite. This is not because of lacking funds, or shouldn't be, considering the instituion. Instead, it is due to the film not needing the time change to capture the atmosphere, as they now rely on CGI computers to fill in the green-coloured backgrounds in most, if not all, of the scenes.

Genre:

Blockbuster: Produced by Hollywood, the typical institution for noir.

Crime/Gangster: Various gangs fight it out, most noticeable being the group under Gale’s control against the mobsters. Old Town baby! There anit gonna be no slowing down. It's the blood-for-blood days. The good old glory days. The all or nothin' days.


Film Noire: The setting and cynical characters gain it that genre. Film noir is believed to be, “A movie characterized by low-key lighting, a bleak urban setting, and corrupt, cynical characters.” Furthermore it is a usually used term “to describe a dark, suspenseful thriller.” ( Watson, James and Hill, Anne (2000) “Dictionary of Media & Communications Studies”, page 114 ) Also alternatively, it’s insisted that “film noir is not a genre, but rather the mood, style, point-of-view, or tone of a film.” ( http://www.filmsite.org/filmnoir.html )

Action: Explosions and car crashes in That Yellow Bastard and The Big Fat Kill. There are also an excess amount of guns, whereas if it were only noir it would only have been one gun perhaps held by one or two men, with the occasional fight for it. Or some switching of it between hands. As seen in L.A Confidential when the cycnical detective anti-hero hands over his badge and weapon. Or Double Indemnity when the dame shots the protagonist.

Comic book: Based on Frank Miller's Sin City comics, much like Spierman and Fantastic Four, only far more adult orientated.

With all this, it appears that Sin City is a hybrid film.

Representation:

The sole coloured male is evil, as equally seen in L.A.Confidential. This contradicts earlier film noir such as Double Indemnity, where their is another single afro-carribean coloured person, however he is a good natured mechanic.

White males are overall the dominanting force of narrative structure and roles. They are both the heroes and the villians, and the blurs between the two that comes so naturally to film noir styled films.

Males in later film noir such as L.A.Confidential and Sin City are generally violent, showing the age-old stereotype. They seem unable to resolve problems peacefully. This heavily contradicts earlier texts such as Double Indeminity and The Maltese Falcon.

Usually roles such as the Less Romantic Heroes, Lone Wolf and Physchopathic Hero are the types seen in noir. Also, male characters are generally "hard-boiled".

Females have taken a turn to violence in this latest film noir. Sin City has a small regiment of ladies looking to slaughter anything that glances at them badly. The audience have never seen a woman so aggressive for noir films. Sure, they're mostly femme fatales. Even with a movement towards Whores in Sin City. But traditionally the stereotype of a more intelligent female character a male was often put across deftly and interestingly. Again, see Double Indemnity. And yes, they're still shown as physically weaker than men.

Both genders need the help of the other, and often fall into a heterosexual relationship. Although, there are slight glimers for the Other in L.A.Confidential and Sin City's lesbian couples.

Audience:

Feminists (some) might whine about the women being Whores and the (CLICHE:) objectifying of women. Undertsandable example being Gale and her Old Town girls. Men (some) however might praise the sheer badassness of all the male characters, and love the (CLICHE:) objectifying of women (male gaze, much?). Also, it's much easier to identify with someone of the same sex. So women will again have to switch gender roles, whereas males won't.

Females (some) might like the fact that several of the men range from pretty-boys (Dwight) too hulking tanks of muscle (Marve). And if they don't; and they definately understandably find women more attrative, there's a breif showing of breast and a bed scene between two ladies. They might also like the Old Town girls making a point about later on about the unwelcomed not stepping foot in their territory. Unless they like the taste of lead.

Institution:

Hollywood. Film noir has always been dominated by Hollywood, with few arthouse films or institutions tackling it. Surprisingly, almost, as film noir is often constituted as a B-movie that relies cheifly on a style that isn't altogether buget battering. The Americanisation of this genre (?) hence explains many of the ideologies that we see.

Ideology:

Heterosexual: Gale and Dwight, standing near a pile of dead bodies, k-i-s-s-i-n-g...heterosexuality has always been a large part of film noir. How else is the femme fatale to seduce the male protagonist if she's replused by him altogether?

Homosexual: Critics (some) suggest that films such as this with gang warfare and mostly males as the leaders of narrative might hint at such an undertone. They're probably just repressing their own hopes....

Lesbians: Two women are "dykes" in Sin City, although their relationship is refered to more in passing glimpes and scenes. Yes, I know that this falls under the above.

Matriarchal: Gale and all the Whores rule the lower slums of in City. In Old Town, their word is absolue law, and they have made pacts between them and the police. There also have a fair amount of femme fatale's.

Patriarchal: Mentioned gangs through dialouge are all ruled solely by male figures (Pimps). The villians and heroes and antiheroes are all males, but women in Old Town are Whores in general.

Perverse (sexual): That's right Nancy....work that pole.....curve those curves...

Misogyny and Sadistic: Woman murdered at beginning and do it at the end with crazy-ass looks on their crazy-ass faces. Scary and pleasing at the ame time. Gail gets her nerve endings crushed. And she gets smacked around a few times, pimp-slapping style.....yeah. I know.

Narrative:

Starts with a disequilibrium common to noir films, even from the very first English one, Double Indemnity. Film noir wastes little time in revealing shitty situations that spiral into worse problems. It just sets the atmosphere from the start.

There are three narratives, technically four. They are adapted from Frank Miller's graphic comics. All of them link to the other. In The Big Fat Kill there is an enigma as to whether a war will start between Old Town in its weakened state, and the opportunist Pimps. And if Old Town will fall to patrichal rule. In The Hard Goodbye, there is an enigma as to who killed Goldie, and why an assassin that looks identical to her is trying to kill the investigator. In That Yellow Bastard, what will happen to hero Hartegan and princess Nancy is the enigma.

Sin City ends like any noir would, with a disturbing equilibrium. Well, it actually gives the audience both resolution and uncertainty in the fact that there just isn't a end to the sin in Sin City. The anti-hero in the beginning that disappeared ties it altogether at the end.Although, it does it in a subtle way. Beautiful.

It's a non-linear, closed narrative.

Piss off, Todorov. We don't need your three-part-theorem here. It can't even be applied to any of the mini-narratives that make up the entire story.

As for binary opposition, we see it in the likes of the unnamed man and woman at the beginning. Further in with the muscular Marv and gentle Goldie. And onwards still with the openly aggressive Gail and calm cut assassin, Miho.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Bibliography:

1) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0401792/

Cast, Crew, Reviews, Plot Summary, Comments, Discussion, Taglines, Trailers, Posters, Photos, Showtimes, Link to Official Site, Fan Sites. Kinda boring. =/

2) http://video.movies.go.com/sincity/

The official Sin City DVD website. Links to the Cast, Behind the Scenes, Trailers and Clips, and even a Game to play. Yay. =)

3) http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/sin_city/

A ton of Sin City reviews. Also includes movie info, a trailer, poster, photos, news, and articles. Seems like a good stop for multiple media needs! =O

4) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4266148.stm

A film poster, which allowed people to view clips from the film Sin City, is banned for condoning violence. Interesting media story, but. Oh my. Whoever would have guessed that an 18+ certificate film, which had the director of Kill Bill - Quintin Taertino - help direct, might possibly condone violence? I shudder to think. >_>

5) http://www.crimeculture.com/Contents/NeoNoir.html

Traces the development of neo-noir from the 1960s onward. Not much more to say, this'll help for the Genre and SHEP section of my essay. @_@

6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_noir

Much like number five. This link looks at neo noire and it's genre elements. It'll be useful to cross-reference between the two, and try and find any ambiguities in one that's cleared up in the other.

7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/film/4561547.stm

Things in Sin City are too violent, people whine. Frank Miller defends his creation, and rightfully so. For the love of god, it's rated 18+. Obviously it's not going to be filled with sunshine and lolipops. =/

8) http://www.theory.org.uk/effects.htm

Media effects. How movies and such can screw with their audience. There aren't many firm theries out their. This link might be more useful to the rest of you guys in my media class. -_-

9) http://www.stevewlb.zen.co.uk/College/Booklets/audiences.htm

Even more audience effect theories and such. From Cultivation to whatever else. Might be useful to the rest of you out there. =)

10) http://www.haberarts.com/mulvey.htm

When looking at a text like Sin City, a theorist like Laura Mulvey, the male gaze, and modern art has to be mentioned somewhere. This is a site that explains her ideas.

11) http://www.filmsite.org/genres.html

All about genres. What they are, the major categories, and the contrasting types. This will be somewhat essential for my study, it being about genre and it's development. Also useful for others. =D

12) http://comicbooks.about.com/od/comicmovies/tp/toptenmovies.htm

Something more for me, also genre based. This is a "top ten" best comic-book-tuned-movie list. It should help to pick another image text to analyse that's similiar to Sin City. Maybe... <_<

13) http://www.filmsite.org/filmnoir.html

Another one near-specific for myself. Film noire genre, very extensively detailed and hugely useful. Contains information for SHEP about the developement of the genre from the second World War. Definitely going to use. =)

14) http://www.westga.edu/~byates/video.htm

Video Violence: Desensitization and Excitation Effects on Learning. Just speaks about audience effect theorise and how they can mess up the mind of the viewing audience. It's one of the debates in Sin City, so I have to look into it. >.<

Wewt. That's all from me for now. kekekekeke. ^_^

Something of a Sinful City


“Sin City” (2005, Hollywood production, directed by Frank Miller, Robert Rodriguez, and a single scene by Quentin Tarantino) posses several voiceovers provided by three main characters. But by extension, this is the only way we hear them. Outside of a sentence or perhaps per twelve scenes, they don't speak.

This is an obvious convention of film noire. One utilized so as to have the audience better identify with the protagonist's perspectives, as well as to give us a particular insight into their emotions and motives. And these mindset's–all stereotypically male–are environed in ripping their opposition a new rear-end.

These constant commentaries can become boring, as they all adhere in a particular preference of a patriarchal society. Hence the heroes’ believes that they need to be the driving narrative force. Something which is bound to annoy some feminists, especially when they quickly realize that there isn’t any female voiceover – another convention of film noire. Which is my point; to all the varyingly violent voices, there isn't any prominent “voice of reason” which would help to create a particularly striking contrast, and the lack of a feminine perceptive suggests that the film noire genre hasn’t developed much from its earlier experiments. That, however, is not to hint that there isn’t anything particularly striking or contrasting in the mise-en-scene.

There is a crisp, sheen of ebony and ivory that is smoothed throughout ever scene of the entire movie, via editing. While “Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow” (2004, Hollywood production, directed by Kerry Conran) was the first film to have utilized this absence of vibrant colour, it is another convention of “black film,” and it's also done for a more intricate result: homage paid in two shades of awesome.

The first is a tribute to the style in which Frank Miller’s acclaimed graphic comics were drawn, the same which this film was adapted from. This is a reverence which should strike such a familiar feel that any of his inherited audience will be nostalgic from the old atmosphere, yet excited by the new.

The final type of homage is to past film-noire movies. They purposely used the lack of Technicolor technology to enhance a gritty atmosphere that is somewhat the essence of these types of film. This is perhaps just one of several reasons behind Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez consciously deciding to do the text in its unique fashion. Especially as they wouldn’t be lacking of funds or media means like those of the past–theirs is a blockbuster with a big budget. Instead, it is done to help highlight the characters.

All the characters have only one outspoken colour on their person, which ranges from their eyes, too their clothing, or just an accessory.

These highlighted item or genetic feature for each character helps us to define their personality. The colours are arranged for simple denotations, blue bleats for cowardice. Red roars for passion, blood, and malice. And yellow for a miasmic aura of rotten, disgusting and spoilt. This gives Sin City an outstandingly vivacious flair that any would be folly to deny. Unfortunately, a lot in this movie is hard to misread, or more accurately, attach many alternative interpretations to. So it may downbeat on those of us whom want to use this text for the analyse section; everything is somewhat obvious in the stagnant Hollywood way of thinking. Except for the narrative structure and plot.

The three different–but interlinked–storylines are neatly woven together. And fans of the comic book will be thrilled to realise that they are based on “The Hard Goodbye”, “The Big Fat Kill”, and “That Yellow Bastard.” Thankfully, those like myself that didn’t know a damn thing about them won’t be left to the beatings, the rapes or the murders of Sin City. Instead, we’ll have Hartigan (Bruce Willis), Dwight (Clive Owen), Gail (Rosario Dawson), Marv (Mickey Rourke) and deadly lil Miho (Devon Aoki) take ‘em for us. All while we’re being pulled fully up to a fast-paced, action-based understanding of how the Old Town femme fatales ensure their own brand of injustice stays intact. And that to maintain that injustice is the only way for our protagonists to escape it themselves. Everything from the acting to the edited slides together beautifully. After dodging the dregs of Sin City, after following these intriguing anti-heroes, it’s impossible for you not to think that, “turn the right corner in Sin City and you can find – anything.”